From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Israel v. Tesla, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 14, 2022
3:22-cv-00462-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00462-LRH-CSD

11-14-2022

SHAUNA ISRAEL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TESLA, INC., TESLA MOTORS, INC., AND TESLA MOTORS NV, INC. Defendants.

LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT MARK MAUSERT, ESQ. SEAN MCDOWELL Attorney for Plaintiff Shauna Israel JACKSON LEWIS P.C. DEVERIE J. CHRISTENSEN, ESQ. HILARY A. WILLIAMS Attorneys for Defendants Tesla, Inc., Tesla Motors, Inc., and Tesla Motors NV, Inc.


LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT

MARK MAUSERT, ESQ.

SEAN MCDOWELL

Attorney for Plaintiff Shauna Israel

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

DEVERIE J. CHRISTENSEN, ESQ.

HILARY A. WILLIAMS

Attorneys for Defendants Tesla, Inc., Tesla Motors, Inc., and Tesla Motors NV, Inc.

ORDER TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION

LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Shauna Israel (“Plaintiff”), through her counsel, Mark Mausert, Esq., and Defendants Tesla, Inc., Tesla Motors, Inc., and Tesla Motors NV, Inc. (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), through their counsel Jackson Lewis P.C., as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed in the United States District Court, District of Nevada on October 20, 2022 and asserted claims related to Plaintiff's employment with Defendants. ECF No. 1.

2. The Parties determined an arbitration agreement applies to this dispute, and the Parties agree the claims alleged by Plaintiff in this action fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement.

3. Thus, the Parties have agreed that this action, in its entirety, shall be submitted to binding arbitration pursuant to the terms of the arbitration agreement, and Plaintiff will initiate arbitration against Defendant with the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services/Endispute, Inc. (“JAMS”). However, upon the Parties' mutual agreement, they may mediate the action through JAMS prior to Plaintiff's submission of the action to arbitration.

4. All proceedings in this action shall be stayed, and this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action pending the conclusion of the JAMS arbitration or the Parties' settlement.

5. Nothing in this Stipulation, nor the fact of entering to the same, shall be construed as waiving any claim and/or defense held by any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Israel v. Tesla, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 14, 2022
3:22-cv-00462-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Israel v. Tesla, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHAUNA ISRAEL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TESLA, INC., TESLA MOTORS…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00462-LRH-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)