From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Israel v. Putrus

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 30, 2013
843 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 147475. COA No. 316249.

2013-09-30

Nejla ISRAEL, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant–Appellant, v. Ramiz PUTRUS and Najah Putrus, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs–Appellees, and Ramiz Putrus and Najah Putrus, Third–Party Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Fouad Zora, Third–Party Defendant, and Bi–County Medical Center, P.C., and Universal Urgent Care, P.C., Intervenor Plaintiff, v. Nejla Israel and Fouad Zora, Intervenor Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Israel v. Putrus

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 30, 2013
843 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Israel v. Putrus

Case Details

Full title:Nejla ISRAEL, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant–Appellant, v. Ramiz PUTRUS and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

843 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 2013)
495 Mich. 867