Ison v. State

Full title: David Earl Ison, Appellant-Petitioner, v. State of Indiana…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Date published: May 8, 2017

Court of Appeals Case No. 24A04-1607-PC-1618 (Ind. App. May. 8, 2017)

Opinion

Court of Appeals Case No. 24A04-1607-PC-1618

05-08-2017

David Earl Ison, Appellant-Petitioner, v. State of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent

APPELLANT PRO SE David Earl Ison Carlisle, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Ian McLean Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

Altice, Judge.

OPINION ON REHEARING

APPELLANT PRO SE

David Earl Ison
Carlisle, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
Attorney General of Indiana

Ian McLean
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana

Appeal from the Franklin Circuit Court

The Honorable J. Steven Cox, Judge

Trial Court Cause No. 24C01-1407-PC-630

Altice, Judge.

[1] The State seeks rehearing and asks that we delete footnote three of our opinion. In that footnote, we erroneously concluded that Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9 contains a technical error. We agree that rehearing is appropriate and therefore grant

rehearing to delete the second paragraph of footnote three. In all other respects the original opinion is affirmed.

Riley, J. and Crone, J., concur.