Ismail v. Dial Exterminating Corp.

Full title: HOSSAM ISMAIL et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIAL EXTERMINATING CORP. et al.…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1993

199 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

608 N.Y.S.2d 61

Opinion

December 28, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.).

We find a triable issue of fact as to whether appellant's vehicle made impact with plaintiff's van, precluding summary judgment in this negligence action (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361, 364-365), and note that neither side submitted admissible documentary evidence in support of their respective positions (see, Canty v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 158 A.D.2d 271, 272 [police report]; Rue v Stokes, 191 A.D.2d 245 [MV-104]).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.