From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ismael v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 5, 1990
570 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-0716.

December 5, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


As costs were assessed against appellant without benefit of notice and a hearing, we reverse the imposition of costs and remand based on Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988). We note that an identical argument was raised by the state in Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, No. 76,102 (Fla. June 7, 1990), wherein we certified the question of whether the imposition of costs against an indigent is different from the collection of those costs, making the question of ability to pay premature until attempt is made to collect such costs.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ismael v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 5, 1990
570 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Ismael v. State

Case Details

Full title:AZAD H. ISMAEL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 5, 1990

Citations

570 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)