]" Broyhill v. Gaither, 119 N.C. 443, 26 S.E. 31 (1896). See Isler v. Dixon, 140 N.C. 529, 53 S.E. 348 (1906). Hence, we hold that the partial clearing and staking of the building lines was "labor" under G.S. 44A-8.
AFFIRMED. Cited: Cheeseborough v. Sanatorium, 134 N.C. 248; Isler v. Dixon, 140 N.C. 529; Alexander v. Farrow, 151 N.C. 323; Hall v. Jones, ib., 424; Roper v. Ins. Co., 161 N.C. 160.