From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Islands, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. of Interior

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 11, 2001
10 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


10 Fed.Appx. 491 (9th Cir. 2001) ISLANDS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-16022. D.C. No. CV-96-01937-FCD. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 11, 2001

Order filed June 5, 2000

Vacating the June 12, 2000 Oral Argument.

Submitted May 7, 2001.

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding.

Before Chief Judge SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The district court's dismissal of this case is vacated in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Central Green Co. v. United States, 531 U.S. 425, 121 S.Ct. 1005, 148 L.Ed.2d 919 (2001), and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with that decision.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Islands, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. of Interior

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 11, 2001
10 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Islands, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. of Interior

Case Details

Full title:ISLANDS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 11, 2001

Citations

10 F. App'x 491 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Kohler v. CJP, Ltd.

Where jurisdiction is intertwined with the merits of the case, “the district court [must] assume[ ] the truth…

Cholakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

jurisdiction is intertwined with merits, " the district court [must] assume[ ] the truth of the allegations…