From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Islaam v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 24, 2016
Civ. No. 16-3664 (RBK) (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Civ. No. 16-3664 (RBK)

08-24-2016

SANTO ISLAAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Previously, this matter was administratively terminated because petitioner did not file his § 2255 motion on the updated form. Subsequently, petitioner has now submitted his § 2255 motion on the proper form such that the Clerk will be ordered to reopen this case. In accordance with Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Rule 4(b), the Court has screened the motion for dismissal and determined that dismissal without an answer and a reply is not warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS this 24th day of August, 2016,

ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this case; and it is further

ORDERED that within forty-five (45) days of the date of the entry of this Order, the United States shall electronically file and serve an answer to the § 2255 motion (Dkt. No. 3); and it is further

ORDERED that the answer shall respond to the allegations and grounds of the motion and shall adhere to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings; and it is further

ORDERED that the answer shall address the merits of each claim raised in the motion as well as whether the motion is timely and whether petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling; and it is further

ORDERED that the answer shall contain an index of exhibits; and it is further

ORDERED that if the answer refers to briefs or transcripts, orders, and other documents from prior proceedings, then the United States shall serve and file them with the answer; and it is further

ORDERED that petitioner may serve and file a reply to the answer within forty-five (45) days after the answer is filed; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

s/Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Islaam v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 24, 2016
Civ. No. 16-3664 (RBK) (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Islaam v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SANTO ISLAAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 24, 2016

Citations

Civ. No. 16-3664 (RBK) (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2016)