From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iskenyan v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
1:19-cv-01260-NONE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01260-NONE-BAM

11-30-2021

TIGRAN ISKENYAN, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION BRIEF (DOC. 24)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On November 29, 2021, the parties filed a second motion for 30-day extension of time. (Doc. 27.) However, the document is not a motion for an extension of time. It is a stipulation signed by counsel to extend the time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for summary. According to the stipulation, Defendant requests an additional thirty-day extension of time in order to further consider the administrative record in light of the issues raised in Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Id. at 1.) The parties also stipulate to modify the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Id. at 2.)

Having considered the stipulation, and good cause appearing, Defendant's request for an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment no later than December 28, 2021. All other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order are modified accordingly. No. further extensions of time will be granted absent a demonstrated showing of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Iskenyan v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
1:19-cv-01260-NONE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Iskenyan v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:TIGRAN ISKENYAN, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01260-NONE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)