From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ishola v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

A01A1131.

DECIDED: AUGUST 1, 2001

D.U.I. Gwinnett State Court. Before Judge Reeves, pro hac vice.

Spruell, Taylor Associates, Billy L. Spruell, Melinda D. Taylor, for appellant.

Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor-General, Carole C. Korn, Jeffrey P. Kwiatkowski, Jonathan D. Aurelia, Assistant Solicitors-General, for appellee.


A jury found Olantunji Ishola guilty of driving with an alcohol concentration greater than 0.10 grams. On appeal Ishola argues that the results of his Intoxilyzer 5000 test should have been excluded. We disagree and affirm.

Ishola argues that the officer who tested him discarded an invalid breath test and did not wait the required 20 minutes for observation before giving a subsequent test, rendering the results invalid and the test inadmissible. In support of this argument, Ishola points to the testimony of a chemist familiar with the Intoxilyzer 5000 who testified that the breath test was improperly administered because Ishola was not seated and constantly observed for 20 minutes to see whether he burped, belched, or regurgitated thereby contaminating the breath test.

The jury was not required to believe the chemist's testimony regarding a 20-minute sit-down requirement. Even if a 20-minute observation period is a requirement, the State showed that such requirement was satisfied. The officer testified that the 20-minute requirement was met in that he stopped Ishola at 3:10 a.m. and the breath test was administered at 3:36 a.m. Although the officer testified that there were probably one and a half minutes where he was securing Ishola's vehicle and did not observe Ishola, "[t]he failure to continuously watch [Ishola] for 20 consecutive minutes prior to the breath test does not require exclusion of the test results."

It was for the jury to assess the credibility of the witnesses. Butler v. State, 273 Ga. 380, 382 (1) ( 541 S.E.2d 653) (2001).

See Klink v. State, 272 Ga. 605, 607 (2) ( 533 S.E.2d 92) (2000) (State complied with 20-minute requirement where defendant was in custody for over 20 minutes).

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bagwell v. State, 248 Ga. App. 806, 808 (1) ( 547 S.E.2d 377) (2001).

Therefore, the trial court did not err in admitting the breath test results.

Judgment affirmed. Andrews, P.J., and Eldridge, J., concur.


DECIDED AUGUST 1, 2001 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED AUGUST 24, 2001.


Summaries of

Ishola v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Ishola v. State

Case Details

Full title:ISHOLA v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Aug 1, 2001

Citations

553 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)
553 S.E.2d 346