From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ishola v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 25, 2013
535 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1371

07-25-2013

KAZEEM ADESHINA ISHOLA, a/k/a John Alexander, a/k/a Robert Hutton, a/k/a Daniel Luroche, a/k/a Victor Sille, a/k/a Christopher J. Pitera, a/k/a James P. McNicolas, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

Kazeem Adeshina Ishola, Petitioner Pro Se. Stefanie A. Svoren-Jay, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kazeem Adeshina Ishola, Petitioner Pro Se. Stefanie A. Svoren-Jay, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kazeem Adeshina Ishola, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ishola's contentions, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2013). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ishola, (B.I.A. Mar. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Ishola v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 25, 2013
535 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Ishola v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:KAZEEM ADESHINA ISHOLA, a/k/a John Alexander, a/k/a Robert Hutton, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 25, 2013

Citations

535 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2013)