From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isgrigg v. Heynie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 20, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P.

July 20, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed June 4, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within fourteen days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That fourteen day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Isgrigg v. Heynie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 20, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Isgrigg v. Heynie

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. ISGRIGG, Plaintiff, v. R. HEYNIE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)