From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isenhower v. S.I.A.C

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 1, 1967
424 P.2d 216 (Or. 1967)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1966

Affirmed March 1, 1967

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

LOREN HICKS, Judge.

Affirmed.

Quintin B. Estell, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Wallace Carpenter, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

No appearance by respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and REDDING, Justices.


Defendant appeals from a judgment allowing plaintiff increased compensation for the aggravation of a back injury suffered while at work.

Defendant contends that there is no evidence to prove aggravation. Further defendant contends that even if it is assumed that there was such evidence, the aggravation could have been the result of a previous back condition and there was no evidence to show that the aggravation resulted from the industrial injury rather than from the previous condition.

We are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Isenhower v. S.I.A.C

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 1, 1967
424 P.2d 216 (Or. 1967)
Case details for

Isenhower v. S.I.A.C

Case Details

Full title:ISENHOWER, Respondent, v. STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 1, 1967

Citations

424 P.2d 216 (Or. 1967)
424 P.2d 216