From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isbell v. Oklahoma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2018
No. C 18-00269 WHA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. C 18-00269 WHA

08-02-2018

SARAH ISBELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, ED LAKE, officially and individually, DAVID HAMMONS, officially and individually, JIM HUTCHINSON, officially and individually, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, ALISHA GRIFFIN, officially and individually, MICHAEL WILKENING, officially and individually, and LISA DUGAN, officially and individually, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the accompanying order dismissing this action, FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of defendants State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Oklahoma Department of Child Support Services, Ed Lake, David Hammons, Jim Hutchinson, State of California, Department of Child Support Services, Alisha Griffin, Michael Wilkening, and Lisa Dugan and against plaintiff Sarah Isbell. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2018.

/s/_________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Isbell v. Oklahoma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2018
No. C 18-00269 WHA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Isbell v. Oklahoma

Case Details

Full title:SARAH ISBELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2018

Citations

No. C 18-00269 WHA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2018)