From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaias v. Fischoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1971
37 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

November 4, 1971


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 30, 1971, denying defendant Ungar's motion dated July 14, 1971 seeking to vacate the original and subsequent notices of pendency unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent only of vacating the original lis pendens filed on May 7, 1968, and, as so modified, affirmed. Two orders of said court entered on July 30, 1971, denying defendant Ungar's motions to dismiss the complaint and vacate the order of receivership unanimously affirmed. Plaintiff-respondent shall recover of defendant-appellant one bill of $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Section 1331 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law requires that in an action to foreclose a real property mortgage, as here, a lis pendens must be filed at least 20 days before final judgment of foreclosure and sale is rendered. Thus, we perceive that the filing of a lis pendens is requisite to the entry of a final judgment. ( Robbins v. Goldstein, 36 A.D.2d 730.) But in the instant case, a reference is in progress, and the entry of final judgment is not yet. Consequently, for the reasons explicated in Robbins ( supra), the filing of a new lis pendens was lawful and timely; and on this record there is no basis for impeding the progress of the foreclosure action, particularly in view of the course of action charted by appellant subsequent to our previous decision reported at 37 A.D.2d 702.

Concur — McGivern, J.P., Markewich, Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Isaias v. Fischoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1971
37 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Isaias v. Fischoff

Case Details

Full title:NAHIM ISAIAS, Respondent, v. DAVID FISCHOFF et al., Defendants, and S.J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1971

Citations

37 A.D.2d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Wasserman v. Harriman

Because Harriman failed to raise a triable issue of fact, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment should…

Ungar v. Mandell

Although S. J. Ungar Realty Affiliates, Inc. is named as a party in some of the state court actions, it is…