From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isabel v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 28, 2012
No. CV 11-01178-PHX-NVW (LOA) (D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-01178-PHX-NVW (LOA)

03-28-2012

Gary Isabel, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Anderson (Doc. 13) regarding petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 8 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Petitioner filed his objection to the R&R on March 27, 2012 (Doc. 14).

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation ofthe Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. The dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

____________

Neil V. Wake

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Isabel v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 28, 2012
No. CV 11-01178-PHX-NVW (LOA) (D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Isabel v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Gary Isabel, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-01178-PHX-NVW (LOA) (D. Ariz. Mar. 28, 2012)