From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isabel T. v. Lucien W.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 14, 2016
138 A.D.3d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-14-2016

In re ISABEL T., Petitioner–Appellant, v. LUCIEN W., Respondent–Respondent.

Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for appellant.


Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for appellant.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about March 17, 2015, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed petitioner's family offense petition against respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that respondent had committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct (Matter of Tamara A. v. Anthony Wayne S., 110 A.D.3d 560, 560, 974 N.Y.S.2d 48 [1st Dept.2013] ). Family Court found neither party to be credible, and its finding is supported by the record and entitled to deference (see Matter of Buskey v. Buskey, 133 A.D.3d 655, 656, 20 N.Y.S.3d 108 [2d Dept.2015] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, WEBBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Isabel T. v. Lucien W.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 14, 2016
138 A.D.3d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Isabel T. v. Lucien W.

Case Details

Full title:In re ISABEL T., Petitioner–Appellant, v. LUCIEN W., Respondent–Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 14, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2906
28 N.Y.S.3d 316

Citing Cases

Gertrudis v. Julceus

"The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family…

De Salmon v. Salmon

Here, the Family Court was presented with sharply conflicting testimony from each of the parties as to…