From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 23, 2002
826 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-3527

Opinion filed July 23, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 20, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Judge L. Ralph Smith.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anne C. Toolan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1) is AFFIRMED. The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348 (2000), does not apply when the sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum permitted by section 775.082, Florida Statutes. See Lee v. State, 808 So.2d 1274 (Fla.3d DCA 2002); McCloud v. State, 803 So.2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla.2d DCA 2001);Gilson v. State 795 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Isaac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 23, 2002
826 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Isaac v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEMUEL E. ISAAC, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 23, 2002

Citations

826 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. State

In several decisions issued after Apprendi, but prior to Blakely, Florida courts held that the rule of…

State v. Fleming

In light of the holding in Apprendi, Florida courts determined that trial courts were still empowered to find…