From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaac v. Midfirst Bank

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 5, 2014
NO. 03-14-00190-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-14-00190-CV

11-05-2014

Rosalind Isaac, Appellant v. Midfirst Bank, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 14-0056-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant Rosalind Isaac seeks to appeal the trial court's judgment in a forcible-detainer suit. See Tex. Prop. Code § 24.002. On October 14, 2014, Isaac filed a pro se brief. The brief, which appears to be a copy of a pleading in some other unidentified case, wholly fails to comply with the briefing requirements of Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. For example, the brief does not (1) contain any statement of facts, (2) articulate any issues or points to be decided, or (3) present any argument or cite to authorities. As a result, we cannot discern what question of law, if any, we have been asked by Isaac to answer. See Boiling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 S.W.3d 893, 896 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Accordingly, Isaac is ordered to file an amended brief complying with the formal and substantive rules of appellate procedure on or before December 4, 2014. If Isaac fails to comply with this order, this Court may strike appellant's brief and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9.

It is so ordered this 5th day of November, 2014. Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field


Summaries of

Isaac v. Midfirst Bank

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 5, 2014
NO. 03-14-00190-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Isaac v. Midfirst Bank

Case Details

Full title:Rosalind Isaac, Appellant v. Midfirst Bank, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-14-00190-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)