From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaac v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2013
Case No. CV 12-8526-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

Summary

concluding petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling due to his appellate counsel's failure to raise claims on direct appeal "because counsel's conduct did not prevent Petitioner from timely seeking state habeas relief on the unexhausted claims before proceeding with a habeas petition"

Summary of this case from Long v. Paramo

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-8526-CAS (JEM)

12-03-2013

ZOELEE ISAAC, Petitioner, v. BRENDA CASH, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.

_______________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Isaac v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2013
Case No. CV 12-8526-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

concluding petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling due to his appellate counsel's failure to raise claims on direct appeal "because counsel's conduct did not prevent Petitioner from timely seeking state habeas relief on the unexhausted claims before proceeding with a habeas petition"

Summary of this case from Long v. Paramo
Case details for

Isaac v. Cash

Case Details

Full title:ZOELEE ISAAC, Petitioner, v. BRENDA CASH, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 12-8526-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Long v. Paramo

habeas relief. As such, equitable tolling is not warranted. See Majoy v. Roe, 296 F.3d 770, 776 n.3 (9th…