From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irwin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 29, 1917
75 So. 701 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

8 Div. 524.

May 29, 1917.

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Morgan County; Thomas W. Wert, Judge.

Dock Irwin was convicted of keeping liquor for sale, and appeals. Reversed and remanded.

G.O. Chenault, of Albany, for appellant. W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The court did not commit error in its various rulings on the evidence. But it having been testified by some of the witnesses that the defendant was seven-eighths Indian, the solicitor, in his closing argument, said:

"Did you ever hear how an Indian liked liquor? A negro's appetite for liquor is not a circumstance to it."

This remark was improper, was not sustained by the evidence, and should have been excluded in defendant's motion. Sykes v. State, 151 Ala. 80, 44 So. 398; Roden v. State, 3 Ala. App. 202, 58 So. 72.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Irwin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 29, 1917
75 So. 701 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Irwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 29, 1917

Citations

75 So. 701 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
16 Ala. App. 109

Citing Cases

Rowland v. State

Charge 9 should have been given at defendant's request. Gilbert v. State, 20 Ala. App. 565, 104 So. 45; Irwin…

Lindsey v. State

The argument was highly improper and warrants a reversal. Guin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 67, 94 So. 788; Irwin…