Irwin Indus. Tool Co. v. Bibow Indus., Inc.

Full title: IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox)…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 23, 2013

530 F. App'x 965 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1112

2013-09-23

IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W. BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants.

RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME. EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock.

JUDGMENT

RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME.

EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk