From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irvington v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 10, 1904
78 S.W. 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1904)

Opinion

No. 2918.

Decided February 10, 1904.

Jail Delivery — What Constitutes Jail.

Where the structure was used as a jail or calaboose and the prisoner was confined therein for a violation of the law, the person forcing the door and releasing the prisoner therefrom is guilty of an offense under the statute, whether the jail belonged to the county or was in an incorporated town.

Appeal from the District Court of Wood. Tried below before Hon. R.W. Simpson.

Appeal from a conviction for breaking into jail and rescuing a prisoner; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

No statement necessary.

No briefs on file for appellant.

Howard Martin, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted for breaking into jail and rescuing a prisoner. The name of the prisoner was Hugh J. Russell, and he had been placed in jail for disturbing the peace. Appellant and Russell had gone to a religious meeting, when appellant became boisterous, and for this reason was arrested and put in jail for the night. Appellant forced the door open and released Russell. The indictment sufficiently charges the offense, and the evidence supports the conviction.

Appellant requested a charge to the effect that if the jail was not in an incorporated town, and that it was situated on Dr. Smith's land, and built by private subscription, the same did not belong to Wood County; therefore, if the jury believed these facts, the house broken into was not in contemplation of law a jail. This charge was properly refused. It was not necessary that the town should be incorporated to constitute the structure a jail, nor was it necessary that it should be the property of Wood County under our statute. It was used as a jail or calaboose; and when that is the case, and the prisoner is confined for a violation of the law, it is under the protection of the statute. We find no error in the record. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Irvington v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 10, 1904
78 S.W. 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1904)
Case details for

Irvington v. the State

Case Details

Full title:R.T. IRVINGTON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 10, 1904

Citations

78 S.W. 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1904)
78 S.W. 928

Citing Cases

Scurlock v. Fairchilds

" We are not unmindful that the conclusion we have reached is in direct conflict with the opionion of our…

Griffin v. Tucker, County Attorney

Local option territories can not be combined into a single political subdivision for the purpose of using the…