From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irving v. Haynes

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division
Jun 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV211-041 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV211-041.

June 13, 2011


ORDER


After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections, as amended, have been filed. In his Objections, Petitioner Alphonso Irving ("Irving") asserts that the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") ignored its own regulations by relying on a record lacking the elements of the offense charged. Irving was convicted in a state court of aggravated assault, and, according to the BOP's determination, Irving is not eligible for early release because of this conviction. The BOP is not required to consider the elements of an offense to determine whether a conviction for that offense is or is not a nonviolent offense. The BOP has not acted outside of its authority, despite Irving's contention to the contrary.

Irving filed a Motion to Amend his Objections, and his Motion is GRANTED.

Irving's Objections are overruled. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Irving's petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.

SO ORDERED, this 9 day of June, 2011.


Summaries of

Irving v. Haynes

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division
Jun 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV211-041 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Irving v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO IRVING, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HAYNES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division

Date published: Jun 13, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV211-041 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 13, 2011)