From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irvin v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 21, 2012
No. 05-12-00866-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 05-12-00866-CR No. 05-12-00867-CR

12-21-2012

JARMARI LEWIS IRVIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-57553-Q, F09-50030-Q


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Jarmari Lewis Irvin appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a) (West 2011); TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (b) (2010). The trial court assessed punishment at five years' imprisonment on the aggravated assault conviction and two years' confinement in a state jail facility on the possession of cocaine conviction. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court's judgments.

______________________

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
120866F.U05

JUDGMENT

JARMARI LEWIS IRVIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-12-00866-CR


Appeal from the 204th Judicial District

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct. No.

F08-57553-Q).

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright,

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

______________________

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

JARMARI LEWIS IRVIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-12-00867-CR


Appeal from the 204th Judicial District

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct. No.

F08-57553-Q).

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright,

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

______________________

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Irvin v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 21, 2012
No. 05-12-00866-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Irvin v. State

Case Details

Full title:JARMARI LEWIS IRVIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

No. 05-12-00866-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2012)