From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ironshore Indem. v. Kay

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2022
2:21-cv-01706-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01706-JAD-BNW

01-25-2022

IRONSHORE INDEMNITY INC., Plaintiff, v. ERIC KAY, Defendant.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10532 James Thurston, Esq. Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Ironshore Indemnity Inc. KAEMPFER CROWELL Louis M. Bubala III, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8974 Ryan M. Lower, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9108 Attorneys for Defendant Eric Kay


WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10532 James Thurston, Esq. Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Ironshore Indemnity Inc.

KAEMPFER CROWELL Louis M. Bubala III, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8974 Ryan M. Lower, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9108 Attorneys for Defendant Eric Kay

STIPULATION REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO IRONSHORE'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Ironshore Indemnity Inc. (“Ironshore”) and defendant Eric Kay (“Kay”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The Scottsdale policy attached as Exhibit 1 to the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 3) is a true, correct and authentic copy of the Scottsdale primary policy issued to NS8, Inc. notwithstanding any minor redactions in the policy.

2. The Ironshore policy attached as Exhibit 2 to the Amended Complaint is a true, correct and authentic copy of the Ironshore excess policy issued to NS8, Inc. notwithstanding any minor redactions in the policy.

3. The “Kay Demand Letter” attached within Group Exhibit 7 the Amended Complaint is a true, correct and authentic copy of: (i) a letter dated July 26, 2021 from Kay's counsel to Ironshore; and (ii) a letter dated July 22, 2021 from Cyber Litigation's counsel to Kay's counsel.

It is so stipulated.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to FRCP 5, I certify that I am an employee of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP and that on this 24th day of January, 2022, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO IRONSHORE'S AMENDED COMPLAINT as follows:

[] by placing same to be deposited for mailing in the United States Mail, in a sealed envelope upon which first class postage was prepaid in Las Vegas, Nevada;

[x] via electronic means by operation of the Court's electronic filing system, upon each party in this case who is registered as an electronic case filing user with the Clerk;

[] via hand-delivery to the addressees listed below;

[] via facsimile;

[] by transmitting via email the document listed above to the email address set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m.


Summaries of

Ironshore Indem. v. Kay

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2022
2:21-cv-01706-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Ironshore Indem. v. Kay

Case Details

Full title:IRONSHORE INDEMNITY INC., Plaintiff, v. ERIC KAY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01706-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)