From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iron Workers Dist. Council of Tennessee Valley & Vicinity Pension Plan v. Crowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 13, 2012
Civil Case No. 09-cv-02914-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 09-cv-02914-REB-BNB

03-13-2012

IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF TENNESSEE VALLEY & VICINITY PENSION PLAN, Derivatively on Behalf of LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAMES Q. CROWE, KEVIN J. O'HARA, SUNIT S. PATEL, MICHAEL B. YANNEY, JAMES O. ELLIS JR., RICHARD R. JAROS, ROBERT E. JULIAN, ARUN NETRAVALI, JOHN T. REED, WALTER SCOTT, JR., and ALBERT C. YATES, Defendants, and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Final Order of Dismissal [#61] filed March 8, 2012. In this motion, and in a previous motion [#59], the parties seek an order approving the voluntary dismissal of this shareholder derivative action. The parties propose a dismissal with prejudice as to the plaintiff and without prejudice otherwise. A parallel shareholder derivative action is pending in state court. In re Level 3 Communications Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2009CV59 (District Court, Broomfield County, Colorado). The parties have complied with the requirements of FED. R. CIV. P. 23.1(c). Thus, the stipulated and voluntary dismissal of this case is appropriate.

"[#61]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Final Order of Dismissal [#61] filed March 8, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 23.1(c) and 41(a), this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the named defendants;

3. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 23.1(c) and 41(a), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the plaintiff, Iron Workers District Council of Tennessee Valley & Vicinity Pension Plan, Derivatively on Behalf of Level 3 Communications, Inc.;

4. That all other pending motions, including those docketed as [#50, #51, and #52], are DENIED as moot; and

5. That this case is CLOSED.

Dated March 13, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Iron Workers Dist. Council of Tennessee Valley & Vicinity Pension Plan v. Crowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 13, 2012
Civil Case No. 09-cv-02914-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Iron Workers Dist. Council of Tennessee Valley & Vicinity Pension Plan v. Crowe

Case Details

Full title:IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF TENNESSEE VALLEY & VICINITY PENSION PLAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No. 09-cv-02914-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 13, 2012)