Ireton v. Ireton

Full title: Patricia J. IRETON, Respondent, v. Stanley C. IRETON, Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

542 S.W.3d 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. ED 105394

12-12-2017

Patricia J. IRETON, Respondent, v. Stanley C. IRETON, Appellant.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Michele Hammond, 1360 South Fifth Street, Suite 269, St. Charles, MO 63301. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: David L. Baylard, 30 South McKinley Street, Union, MO 63084.

PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Michele Hammond, 1360 South Fifth Street, Suite 269, St. Charles, MO 63301.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: David L. Baylard, 30 South McKinley Street, Union, MO 63084.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Ireton appeal from the judgment denying his motion to set aside the default judgment entered against him on Patricia Ireton’s petition for dissolution. The respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. There was no abuse of discretion here, and we affirm.An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).