From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ireland v. Shasta Cnty. Sheriff's Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0488 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0488 JAM CKD P

07-20-2012

SHAWN A. IRELAND, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed June 4, 2012, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ireland v. Shasta Cnty. Sheriff's Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0488 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Ireland v. Shasta Cnty. Sheriff's Dept.

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN A. IRELAND, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0488 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)