From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IPCS v. SPRINT NEXTEL

Supreme Court of Delaware
Aug 1, 2008
956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

Summary

stating that the denial of a "motion to dismiss or stay on the ground of forum non conveniens" is an "interlocutory ruling"

Summary of this case from GXP Capital, LLC v. Argonaut Mfg. Servs.

Opinion

No. 361, 2008.

August 1, 2008.

Appeal from the Chancery CA 3746.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS. APPEAL REFUSED.


Summaries of

IPCS v. SPRINT NEXTEL

Supreme Court of Delaware
Aug 1, 2008
956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

stating that the denial of a "motion to dismiss or stay on the ground of forum non conveniens" is an "interlocutory ruling"

Summary of this case from GXP Capital, LLC v. Argonaut Mfg. Servs.

refusing to accept interlocutory appeal of a "discretionary" order staying litigation

Summary of this case from Feuer v. Zuckerberg
Case details for

IPCS v. SPRINT NEXTEL

Case Details

Full title:iPCS, Inc. v. Sprint Nextel Corp

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Aug 1, 2008

Citations

956 A.2d 31 (Del. 2008)

Citing Cases

GXP Capital, LLC v. Argonaut Mfg. Servs.

See, e.g., Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Axiall Corp., 219 A.3d 523, 2019 WL 4795508, at *2…

GXP Capital, LLC v. Argonaut Mfg.

See Lima Delta Co. v. Global Aerospace, Inc., 2016 WL 1436582, at *2 (Del. Apr. 5, 2016) (refusing to grant…