From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IPA Techs. v. Google LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2021-1438 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1438 2021-1439

03-11-2022

IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC., Appellant v. GOOGLE LLC, Appellee

Mieke K. Malmberg, Skiermont Derby LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Steven Wayne Hartsell, Jaime Olin, Paul Skiermont, Sarah Elizabeth Spires, Dallas, TX. Naveen Modi, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Arvind Jairam, Stephen Blake Kinnaird, Joseph Palys, Daniel Zeilberger; Michael C. Hendershot, Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00733, IPR2019-00734.

Mieke K. Malmberg, Skiermont Derby LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Steven Wayne Hartsell, Jaime Olin, Paul Skiermont, Sarah Elizabeth Spires, Dallas, TX.

Naveen Modi, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Arvind Jairam, Stephen Blake Kinnaird, Joseph Palys, Daniel Zeilberger; Michael C. Hendershot, Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

(Dyk, Schall, and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

IPA Techs. v. Google LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2021-1438 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

IPA Techs. v. Google LLC

Case Details

Full title:IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC., Appellant v. GOOGLE LLC, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-1438 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)