From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

I.P. v. Henneberry

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01681-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01681-WYD-MEH.

August 25, 2010


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [filed August 13, 2010; docket #59]. The matter is referred to this Court for disposition. (Docket #60.) The motion is fully briefed and oral argument would not assist the Court in its adjudication. In light of the agreement reached by the parties through the briefing on the motion, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants' Motion and declines to award fees to either side.

Plaintiff, in her response, offers to conduct the two depositions by telephone and pay each expert for two hours of time as soon as funds are available out of the fund controlled by the Jefferson County District Court, "provided that they both refund the fee if they are not called at trial or certified as experts." (Docket #61 at 6.) Defendants, in their reply, state they "have no objection to a two hour telephone deposition paid by Plaintiff, as suggested in Plaintiff's Response." (Docket #62 at 3.) Therefore, the parties have reached an agreement regarding the issue raised in Defendants' motion, and the Court need not enter an order.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [filed August 13, 2010; docket #59].


Summaries of

I.P. v. Henneberry

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01681-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 25, 2010)
Case details for

I.P. v. Henneberry

Case Details

Full title:I.P., a minor, by and through her mother and conservator, Cynthia…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 25, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01681-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 25, 2010)