Opinion
7:22-cv-04757-VB
11-10-2022
ILYA FELIKSOVICH lOSILEVICH, Plaintiff, v. WALMART, INC., et al., Defendants.
AMENDED ORDER OF SERVICE
VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his constitutional rights.
On June 7, 2022, plaintiff filed the complaint. (Doc. #2.) On July 6, 2022, the Court entered an amended Order of Service which directed the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service on defendants Walmart, Inc., Joseph Negron, John T. Reicherter, Kevin P. Bruen, and Westchester County. (Doc. #7).
On October 20, 2022, the Court ordered the Office of the New York State Attorney General (“NYAG”) to ascertain an updated address where defendant Reicherter may be served. (Doc. #18).
By letter dated November 9, 2022, the Attorney General has now provided a new address for defendant Reicherter, (Doc. #19).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the named defendant listed in the Appendix to this Order. The Clerk is further instructed to issue a summons listing the defendant and deliver to the Marshals Service all paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the defendant. The service address for the defendant is appended to this Order.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45 (1962).
Plaintiff also must notify the Court in writing if plaintiff s address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.
Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.
SO ORDERED: