Opinion
February 13, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in its determination of the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees (see, Levine v. Levine, 179 A.D.2d 625; Reid v. Reid, 166 A.D.2d 811; Shrauger v. Shrauger, 146 A.D.2d 955), or in its determination that the defendant would only be responsible for one-third of these fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [d]; DeCabrera v. Carbrea-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879; Kavanakudiyil v Kavanakudiyil, 203 A.D.2d 250; Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, 164 A.D.2d 906).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.