From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inzeo v. Inzeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 13, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in its determination of the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees (see, Levine v. Levine, 179 A.D.2d 625; Reid v. Reid, 166 A.D.2d 811; Shrauger v. Shrauger, 146 A.D.2d 955), or in its determination that the defendant would only be responsible for one-third of these fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [d]; DeCabrera v. Carbrea-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879; Kavanakudiyil v Kavanakudiyil, 203 A.D.2d 250; Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, 164 A.D.2d 906).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Inzeo v. Inzeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Inzeo v. Inzeo

Case Details

Full title:PHILOMENA INZEO, Appellant, v. DENNIS INZEO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 337