INVO, Inc. v. Ring Power Corp.

Full title: INVO, Inc., Appellant, v. Ring Power Corporation, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

No. 1D21-2102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-2102

10-12-2022

INVO, Inc., Appellant, v. Ring Power Corporation, Appellee.

Michael R. Vater of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant. Christen E. Luikart, Catherine M. Licandro, and Jordan Janoski of Murphy & Anderson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Monica J. Brasington, Judge.

Michael R. Vater of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant.

Christen E. Luikart, Catherine M. Licandro, and Jordan Janoski of Murphy & Anderson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."); Thurman v. Davis, 321 So.3d 341, 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) ("Without a transcript or statement of the evidence, the reviewing court is 'limited to a consideration of any fundamental error which appears on the face of the order' and, finding none, must affirm the final judgment.") (quoting Carney v. Carney, 861 So.2d 1272, 1273-74 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)).

KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur