From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Neosel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 27, 2013
No.: 3:09-CV-251 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:09-CV-251

02-27-2013

INVISIBLE FENCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN NEOSEL, an individual d/b/a ACORN MARKETING, INC., d/b/a ACORN PETCO, and ACORN MARKETING, INC., d/b/a ACORN PETCO, Defendants.


(VARLAN/GUYTON)


ORDER

This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on February 5, 2013 [Doc. 32]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends granting plaintiff's request for attorney fees and monetary sanctions and denying plaintiff's request to transfer the acornpetco.com domain name. More specifically, the magistrate judge recommends that defendants be fined $100,000 for failure to comply with the Court's default judgment order and that plaintiff be awarded $8,934.40 in reasonable expenses from defendants in connection with its motion to show cause and for sanctions. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 32] and GRANTS plaintiff's request for attorney fees and monetary sanctions and DENIES plaintiff's request to transfer the acornpetco.com domain name. Defendants are hereby FINED $100,000 for failure to comply with the Court's default judgment order and plaintiff is AWARDED $8,934.40 in reasonable expenses from defendants in connection with its motion to show cause and for sanctions. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order, via certified mail, to defendants at the address provided by plaintiff: Martin Neosel, Acorn Marketing, Inc., 47-09 188th Street, Queens, New York 11358.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Thomas A. Varlan

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Neosel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 27, 2013
No.: 3:09-CV-251 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Neosel

Case Details

Full title:INVISIBLE FENCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN NEOSEL, an individual d/b/a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:09-CV-251 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2013)