From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Intrepidus, LLC v. Bivins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 1, 2019
No. 15-CV-7721-LTS-HBP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2019)

Summary

recommending that plaintiff recover its capital investment rendered worthless by defendant's misappropriation and conversion because "[defendant's] default and [his] abandonment of litigation ... render[ed] the most appropriate remedies unprovable."

Summary of this case from Chadha v. Chadha

Opinion

No. 15-CV-7721-LTS-HBP

10-01-2019

INTREPIDUS, LLC, a member of Seductive Approach LLC, suing in the right of SEDUCTIVE APPROACH LLC, Plaintiff, v. GLENN J. BIVINS and ERIC MONSE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Pitman's September 16, 2019, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 90) which recommends that (i) judgment be entered against Defendant Glenn J. Bivins awarding Plaintiff Intrepidus, LLC $35,500.00 in damages, and that (ii) Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs be denied. No objections to the Report have been received.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge]." 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2017). "In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00 Civ. 8117, at *1, 2003 WL 21433443 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003).

The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Pitman's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor as against Defendant Glenn J. Bivins in the amount of $35,500.00. Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs is denied. This Order resolves docket entry nos. 82 and 90.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

October 1, 2019

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Intrepidus, LLC v. Bivins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 1, 2019
No. 15-CV-7721-LTS-HBP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2019)

recommending that plaintiff recover its capital investment rendered worthless by defendant's misappropriation and conversion because "[defendant's] default and [his] abandonment of litigation ... render[ed] the most appropriate remedies unprovable."

Summary of this case from Chadha v. Chadha
Case details for

Intrepidus, LLC v. Bivins

Case Details

Full title:INTREPIDUS, LLC, a member of Seductive Approach LLC, suing in the right of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

No. 15-CV-7721-LTS-HBP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2019)

Citing Cases

Chadha v. Chadha

Therefore, Munish is entitled to recover his $100,000 investment as either "expenses of preparation and of…