In Clifton v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 939 (5th Cir. 1984) (unpublished), we held that Clifton's tardiness in filing the Rule 4(a)(5) motions to vacate required dismissal of the appeal and that the district court's denial of the Rule 60(b) motion was not an abuse of discretion.
Summary of this case from Clifton v. HecklerNo. 82-4414.
April 18, 1984.
N.D.Miss.
AFFIRMED
In Clifton v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 939 (5th Cir. 1984) (unpublished), we held that Clifton's tardiness in filing the Rule 4(a)(5) motions to vacate required dismissal of the appeal and that the district court's denial of the Rule 60(b) motion was not an abuse of discretion.
Summary of this case from Clifton v. HecklerFull title:International Woodworkers, v. Champion
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Apr 18, 1984
The district court denied this motion on August 26. Clifton then filed several additional motions to enlarge…