Opinion
2:22-CV-01863-GMN-BNW
02-17-2023
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE INC., a New York corporation dba IM MASTERY ACADEMY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID IMONITIE an individual; SPELA SLUGA, an individual; DEVON ROESER, an individual; IVAN TAPIA, an individual; NVISIONU, INC., a Delaware corporation; ILYKIT, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, LUCAS LONGMIRE, an individual; NATHAN SAMUEL, an individual; MICHAEL ZHOR, an individual; IMRAN RICHIE, an individual; JUSTIN OWENS, an individual; PAULO CAVALLERI, an individual; JOSE MIGUEL CONTREAS, an individual; BASS GRANT, an individual; ANGELA CRUISHANK, an individual; JEFF CRUISHANK, an individual; VINCE MURPHY, an individual; GARY MCSWEEN, an individual; KATRINA WORGESS, an individual; LUIS RONALDO HARNANDEZ ARRIAGA, an individual; STEPHANIA AYO, an individual; SILVIA AYO, an individual; CATALINA VASQUEZ, an individual; MATHIAS VASQUEZ, an individual; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants. AND ALL RELATED MATTERS
SLIGHTING LAW, Bradley S. Slighting, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants David Imonitie, Spela Sluga, Devon Roeser, NVisionU, Inc., Bass Grant, Lucas Longmire, Vince Murphy WELLMAN AND WARREN LLP, Chris Wellman, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice), Wellman and Warren, LLP Attorneys for Defendants David Imonitie, Spela Sluga, Devon Roeser, NVisionU, Inc., Bass Grant, Lucas Longmire, Vince Murphy HOLLAND & HART LLP, Lars K. Evensen, Jenapher Lin, Esq. KERR SIMPSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P. Sterling Kerr, Esq., George E. Robinson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff International Markets Live, Inc. dba IM Mastery Academy THOMPSON BURTON, PLLC, Jon E. Field, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant ILYKIT, LLC JAMES DODGE RUSSELL & STEPHENS PC, Justin L. James, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Ivan Tapia
SLIGHTING LAW, Bradley S. Slighting, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants David Imonitie, Spela Sluga, Devon Roeser, NVisionU, Inc., Bass Grant, Lucas Longmire, Vince Murphy
WELLMAN AND WARREN LLP, Chris Wellman, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice), Wellman and Warren, LLP Attorneys for Defendants David Imonitie, Spela Sluga, Devon Roeser, NVisionU, Inc., Bass Grant, Lucas Longmire, Vince Murphy
HOLLAND & HART LLP, Lars K. Evensen, Jenapher Lin, Esq.
KERR SIMPSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P. Sterling Kerr, Esq., George E. Robinson, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff International Markets Live, Inc. dba IM Mastery Academy
THOMPSON BURTON, PLLC, Jon E. Field, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant ILYKIT, LLC
JAMES DODGE RUSSELL & STEPHENS PC, Justin L. James, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Ivan Tapia
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS BASS GRANT, LUCAS LONGMIRE AND VINCE MURPHY'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR REPLIES TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES (ECF. NOS. 104, 105, 106, 111 AND 112) TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 87, 88, 89, 98 AND 99)
Defendants Bass Grant (“Grant”), Lucas Longmire (“Longmire”) and Vince Murphy (“Murphy”) or (“Defendants”), and Plaintiff International Markets Live Inc. dba IM Mastery Academy, (collectively as the “Parties”) by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, the law firms of Slighting Law, Wellman and Warren, LLP, Kerr Simpson Attorneys at Law and Holland & Hart LLP, hereby stipulate and agree to: 1) extend the deadline for Grant and Longmire to reply to Plaintiff's responses to Grant's and Longmire's 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss (ECF. Nos. 87, 88 and 89); and 2) extend the deadline for Murphy to reply to Plaintiff's responses to Murphy's 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) Motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 98 and 99). The parties hereby specifically agree and stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2023, Grant filed his 12(b)(2) Motion to dismiss re: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 89) and Longmire filed his 12(b)(2) Motion to dismiss to Plaintiff's FAC (ECF No. 88). In addition, Grant and Longmire filed jointly their 12(b)(6) Motion to dismiss to Plaintiff's FAC (ECF No. 87).
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Response (ECF. No. 106) to Grant's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss, its response (ECF No. 105) to Longmire's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss and its response (ECF No. 106) to Grant and Longmire's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss.
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2023, Defendant Murphy filed his 12(b)(6) Motion to dismiss re: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 98) and also his 12(b)(2) Motion to dismiss to Plaintiff's FAC (ECF No. 99).
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Response to Murphy's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and also its response to Murphy's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss (ECF. No. 111; ECF No. 112).
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2023 and also on February 16, 2023, counsel for the parties met and conferred and agreed to allow Grant, Longmire, and Murphy additional time from the current due dates of February 20, 2023 (Grant and Longmire) and February 23, 2023 (Murphy) to file their reply briefs.
THEREFORE, the parties jointly stipulate that the Court should enter an order allowing Grant, Longmire, and Murphy to file their reply briefs by no later than March 6, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.