Opinion
2:22-CV-01863-GMN-BNW
07-28-2023
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE INC., a New York corporation dba IM MASTERY ACADEMY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID IMONITIE an individual; SPELA SLUGA, an individual; DEVON ROESER, an individual; IVAN TAPIA, an individual; NVISIONU, INC., a Delaware corporation; ILYKIT, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, LUCAS LONGMIRE, an individual; NATHAN SAMUEL, an individual; MICHAEL ZHOR, an individual; IMRAN RICHIE, an individual; JUSTIN OWENS, an individual; PAULO CAVALLERI, an individual; JOSE MIGUEL CONTREAS, an individual; BASS GRANT, an individual; ANGELA CRUIKSHANK, an individual; JEFF CRUIKSHANK, an individual; VINCE MURPHY, an individual; GARY MCSWEEN, an individual; KATRINA WORGESS, an individual; LUIS RONALDO HARNANDEZ ARRIAGA, an individual; STEPHANIA AYO, an individual; SILVIA AYO, an individual; CATALINA VASQUEZ, an individual; MATHIAS VASQUEZ, an individual; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants. AND ALL RELATED MATTERS
SLIGHTING LAW BRADLEY S. SLIGHTING, ESQ. (NBN 10225) JUSTIN L. JAMES (PRO HAC VICE) UTAH BAR NO. 15167 JAMES DODGE RUSSELL & STEPHENS PC ATTORNEYS FOR IVAN TAPIA, JUSTIN OWENS, ANGELA CRUICKSHANK, JEFF CRUICKSHANK SLIGHTING LAW BRADLEY S. SLIGHTING, ESQ. (NBN 10225) CHRISTOPHER WELLMAN (PRO HAC VICE) CALIFORNIA BAR NO. 304700 WELLMAN & WARREN LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS DAVID IMONITIE; SPELA SLUGA; DEVON ROESER; NVISIONU, INC., BASS GRANT, LUCAS LONGMIRE, VINCE MURPHY HOLLAND & HART LLP LARS K. EVENSEN, ESQ. JENAPHER LIN, ESQ. KERR SIMPSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. STERLING KERR, ESQ. GEORGE E. ROBINSON, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER TERRY
SLIGHTING LAW BRADLEY S. SLIGHTING, ESQ. (NBN 10225) JUSTIN L. JAMES (PRO HAC VICE) UTAH BAR NO. 15167 JAMES DODGE RUSSELL & STEPHENS PC ATTORNEYS FOR IVAN TAPIA, JUSTIN OWENS, ANGELA CRUICKSHANK, JEFF CRUICKSHANK
SLIGHTING LAW BRADLEY S. SLIGHTING, ESQ. (NBN 10225) CHRISTOPHER WELLMAN (PRO HAC VICE) CALIFORNIA BAR NO. 304700 WELLMAN & WARREN LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS DAVID IMONITIE; SPELA SLUGA; DEVON ROESER; NVISIONU, INC., BASS GRANT, LUCAS LONGMIRE, VINCE MURPHY
HOLLAND & HART LLP LARS K. EVENSEN, ESQ. JENAPHER LIN, ESQ. KERR SIMPSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. STERLING KERR, ESQ. GEORGE E. ROBINSON, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS LIVE, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER TERRY
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF REPLY TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF NO. 233) (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant/Counterclaimant Ivan Tapia (“Tapia”), along with Defendant/Counterclaimant David Imonitie and Defendants Spela Sluga, Devon Roeser and NVisionU, Inc. (collectively, the “Joint Defendants”), and Plaintiff/Counterdefendant International Markets Live Inc. (“IML”), (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, the law firms of Slighting Law, James Dodge Russell & Stephens PC, Wellman & Warren LLP, Kerr Simpson Attorneys at Law, and Holland & Hart LLP, hereby stipulate and agree to: 1) extend the deadline for Joint Defendants to file their Reply to IML's Response to Defendants' Joint Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 233) to from July 27, 2023 to August 4, 2023 . This is the first stipulation to extend the Reply deadline. The Parties hereby specifically agree and stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2023, Joint Defendants filed their Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 222).
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2023, IML filed its Response to Defendants' Joint Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 233), thereby making Joint Defendants' Reply to IML's Response currently due July 27, 2023.
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2023, counsel for the Parties met and conferred via text message and agreed to allow Joint Defendants an additional eight (8) days to file their Reply to IML's Response, thereby extending the deadline for their Reply from July 27, 2023 to August 4, 2023.
WHEREAS, no parties oppose the extension of time for the filing of Joint Defendants' Reply to IML's Response as set forth herein.
THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Joint Defendants to file their Reply to IML's Response to Defendants' Joint Motion for Protective Order from July 27, 2023 to August 4, 2023 and respectfully request that the Court approve and order the same.
IT IS SO ORDERED.