From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental v. McNulty

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 14, 2022
20-CV-4979 (LGS) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-4979 (LGS) (BCM)

07-14-2022

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS UNION LOCAL 361, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE T MCNULTY, Defendant.


ORDER

BARBARA MOSES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties were due in court today at 10:00 a.m. for a status conference. (Dkt. No. 107 ¶ 8.) At approximately 9:20 this morning, Chambers contacted the parties by email to advise that the conference would commence at 10:30 rather than 10:00. Pro se defendant McNulty then telephoned chambers, stating that he had requested an adjournment until October, that plaintiff had agreed to it, and therefore that he would not appear today.

There is no adjournment request on the docket of this action. Nor did the Court issue any adjournment order.

At 10:30 a.m., plaintiffs' counsel, Damien O. Maree, appeared for the conference. Attorney Maree advised the Court's staff that he had agreed only to a "brief" adjournment of the conference (not an adjournment until October), and that in the absence of any Court order adjourning today's conference he had appeared as scheduled.

After investigation, the Court learned that the following occurred:

On July 11, 2022, defendant McNulty sent an email to temporary prosefiling@nysd.courts,gov, to which he attached an unsigned letter, in Word format, stating that the parties had "agreed to an adjournment looking for dates any time in October 2022." Although the unsigned letter in Word format bore a typed "cc" notation to attorney
Maree, the July 11 email itself did not include any "cc's." It is thus not clear to the Court whether Mr. Maree ever saw the unsigned letter in Word format.

The unsigned letter in Word format was not docketed because it did not comply with this Court's Instructions for Filing Documents by Email, which state, in relevant part:

Available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/instructions-filing-documents-email.

• SIGN. You must sign your document by either signing the document before you scan it or typing “ [Your Name].” The Court will accept typed signatures in this format.
• EMAIL the PDF document to TemporaryProSeFiling@nysd.uscourts.gov. (Emphases added.)

Consequently, the Court was unaware that any adjournment request was made.

Both parties receive instant notification whenever a letter or other filing is docketed, and whenever the Court grants an adjournment or issues any other written order. In this case, neither party received any notification that McNulty's letter was docketed or that the conference was adjourned. The Court surmises that McNulty never checked the docket or otherwise followed up on his adjournment request.

Although defendant is pro se, he signed up for electronic service via ECF. (Dkt. No. 108.)

In light of these events, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The status conference scheduled for today is ADJOURNED to October 4, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 20A of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse. The parties' updated joint status letter (see Dkt. No. 107 ¶ 8) is due no later than September 27, 2022.
2. Defendant McNulty is reminded that it is his obligation to comply with all Court rules, procedures, and deadlines, and to appear for all scheduled conferences and other proceedings. It is also his obligation to inform himself as to the status of any requests he had made or believes he has made. He may review the Court's electronic docket at any time through PACER
or by visiting the Courthouse. Should McNulty once again fail to appear without excuse for a scheduled Court proceeding, the Court may impose sanctions, including but not limited to the opposing party's attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred in preparing for and attending the proceeding.
3. If he has not done so already, defendant McNulty shall serve his automatic disclosures pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1), and respond to plaintiffs' initial request for the production of documents, no later than July 29, 2022. Should he fail to do so, the Court may impose sanctions, including but not limited to the opposing party's attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred in compelling discovery compliance or as a result of defendants' delay.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental v. McNulty

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 14, 2022
20-CV-4979 (LGS) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental v. McNulty

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 14, 2022

Citations

20-CV-4979 (LGS) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2022)