From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inthavongxay v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
2:13-cv-2249 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)

Opinion


CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-2249 WBS DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. March 23, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.

         On March 20, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendant's motion to compel. Attorney Russell Robinson appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff and attorney Ariana Van Alstine appeared on behalf of the defendant.

         Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Defendant's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 26) is granted; and

         2. Plaintiff shall provide the disclosures to defendant by close of business Monday March 23, 2015. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to comply with this order will result in the imposition of sanctions.


Summaries of

Inthavongxay v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
2:13-cv-2249 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Inthavongxay v. County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 23, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-2249 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)