From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Interstate v. Nautilus

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 6, 2009
326 F. App'x 517 (11th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-15413 Non-Argument Calendar.

May 6, 2009.

Derrick Lee Bingham, Charles J. Cole, J. Pargen Robertson, Jr., Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones Sweeney, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew D. Horowitz, Drew Eckl Farnham, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 07-01157-CV-CAP-1.

Before BLACK, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.


Interstate Protective Service, Inc. (IPS), appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Nautilus Insurance Company (Nautilus) and denial of IPS's motion for partial summary judgment. Specifically, IPS argues the district court erred in finding its commercial liability insurance policy, issued by Nautilus, excluded coverage for damages arising from a January 2003 robbery of a money center that was guarded by IPS.

After a de novo review of the record and consideration of the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not err in its grant of summary judgment to Nautilus and denial of IPS's motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Interstate v. Nautilus

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 6, 2009
326 F. App'x 517 (11th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Interstate v. Nautilus

Case Details

Full title:INTERSTATE PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAUTILUS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: May 6, 2009

Citations

326 F. App'x 517 (11th Cir. 2009)