From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Internet Patents Corp. v. QuinStreet Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
No. CV 12-06506 JSC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. CV 12-06506 JSC

03-27-2013

INTERNET PATENTS CORP, Plaintiff, v. QUINSTREET INC, Defendant.


ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Jon S. Tigar in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials JST immediately after the case number. All hearing dates presently scheduled are vacated and motions should be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned. Briefing schedules remain unchanged. See Civil L.R. 7-7(d). Matters for which a magistrate judge has already issued a report and recommendation shall not be rebriefed or noticed for hearing before the newly assigned judge; such matters shall proceed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

_________________

Richard W. Wieking

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Internet Patents Corp. v. QuinStreet Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
No. CV 12-06506 JSC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Internet Patents Corp. v. QuinStreet Inc.

Case Details

Full title:INTERNET PATENTS CORP, Plaintiff, v. QUINSTREET INC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

No. CV 12-06506 JSC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)