From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

International Systems v. Delcrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 10, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment solely on the law of the case doctrine. The order for a new trial by this court in International Sys. v. Delcrete Corp. ( 103 A.D.2d 1008) does not necessarily imply that plaintiff has established a prima facie case (see, Garcia v. City of New York, 104 A.D.2d 438, affd 65 N.Y.2d 805; Barrett v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co., 58 A.D.2d 320, affd 44 N.Y.2d 872, cert denied 440 U.S. 912). This court never passed upon the issue of sufficiency of notice under UCC 2-607 (3) (a). Thus, the merits of the motion and the sufficiency of the notice have still not been ruled upon. Where an issue has not been ruled upon by Special Term, this court will not review the issue on appeal (see, City of Rochester v Chiarella, 86 A.D.2d 110, 114, affd 58 N.Y.2d 316; Omowale v State of New York, 72 A.D.2d 955, 956).


Summaries of

International Systems v. Delcrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

International Systems v. Delcrete Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS, a Division of INTEREDEC (U.S.A.), INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Flex-O-Vit USA, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

In addition, Racine and Louvers sought summary judgment on the ground that they are not subject to successor…

Brylgrove Limited v. Tompkins

Thus, the requirement of complying with the statute of frauds in a contract claim would in no way undermine…