From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

International Settlement Holding v. Officemax North A.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 20, 2009
No. C-08-03647 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)

Opinion

No. C-08-03647 MHP.

February 20, 2009


ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)


The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

International Settlement Holding v. Officemax North A.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 20, 2009
No. C-08-03647 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)
Case details for

International Settlement Holding v. Officemax North A.

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT HOLDING CORPORATION, Plaintiff(s), v. OFFICEMAX…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2009

Citations

No. C-08-03647 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)