From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

International Mercantile Marine Co., v. Stranahan

U.S.
Jun 1, 1909
214 U.S. 344 (1909)

Opinion

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Nos. 510, 511.

Argued January 11, 12, 1909. Decided June 1, 1909.

Decided on the authority of the preceding case.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. William G. Choate and Mr. Lucius H. Beers for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Wade H. Ellis, Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Henry L. Stimson, Mr. Winfred T. Demson and Mr E.P. Grosvenor were on the brief for defendant in error.fn1

For abstracts of argument see pages 322-329, ante.


These writs of error are prosecuted to obtain the reversal of judgments entered in favor of the United States in actions brought to recover back sums paid as penalties imposed and collected under authority of § 9 of the Immigration Act of March 3, 1903. One action concerned penalties exacted before and the other related to a penalty which attached after the promulgation by the Secretary of Commerce and Labor of a certain rule of procedure known as circular No. 58. As the controversies in these cases are of the same nature as that presented by the record in Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Limited, v. The United States, No. 509, just decided, ante, p. 320, and as the principles which controlled the decision in that case are here absolutely decisive, the judgments in these cases must be, and they are,

Affirmed.


Summaries of

International Mercantile Marine Co., v. Stranahan

U.S.
Jun 1, 1909
214 U.S. 344 (1909)
Case details for

International Mercantile Marine Co., v. Stranahan

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL MERCANTILE MARINE COMPANY v . STRANAHAN. SAME v . SAME

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 1, 1909

Citations

214 U.S. 344 (1909)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Cordray v. Morrow Sanitary Co.

{¶ 26} "Civil penalties can be used as a tool to implement a regulatory program." State ex rel. Brown v.…

Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States, (1958)

It is conceded by the defendant that this court possesses the power to adjudicate constitutional issues…