From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Interlink Prods. Int'l v. Bohan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-cv-02277-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02277-KJM-CKD 2:20-cv-02283-KJM-CKD

06-24-2022

INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. DREW BOHAN, and MELISSA RAE KING, Defendants.

Michael Tenenbaum, Esq. THE OFFICE OF MICHAEL TENENBAUM, ESQ. Counsel for Plaintiff Interlink Products International, Inc. ROB BONTA Attorney General of California RUSSELL B. HILDRETH Supervising Deputy Attorney General COURTNEY COVINGTON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants


Action Filed: June 23, 2020

Michael Tenenbaum, Esq. THE OFFICE OF MICHAEL TENENBAUM, ESQ. Counsel for Plaintiff Interlink Products International, Inc.

ROB BONTA Attorney General of California RUSSELL B. HILDRETH Supervising Deputy Attorney General

COURTNEY COVINGTON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller, Judge

Pursuant to the Court's Stipulated Order of June 11, 2021, the parties provide the following status report:

In light of the similar issues to those raised in Interlink's First Amended Complaint, the parties entered into a stipulation to stay the two above-captioned consolidated actions pending the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec v. Bonta, Ninth Circuit case no. 20-55882/20-55944 (Canards III). See Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Stay of Consolidated Actions, ECF No. 51. On June 11, 2021, the Court entered the Order Re Stay of Consolidated Actions. ECF No. 52.

On May 6, 2022, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Canards III, holding that the California statute challenged in that case was not preempted and did not violate the dormant Commerce Clause, and that certain “transactions are out-of-state sales permitted by California law.” Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec v. Bonta (Canards III), 33 F.4th 1107, 1112 (9th Cir. 2022).

The plaintiffs in Canards III have filed a petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit's mandate in that case will not issue until after the resolution of the petition and any further proceedings on appeal. For the same reasons of conserving the parties' and the Court's resources as previously stipulated and ordered, the parties agree that the Court's stay should remain in effect pending the issuance of the Ninth Circuit's mandate in Canards III.

Under the parties' prior stipulation and order in this case, Defendants' responsive pleading would be due June 20, 2022, i.e., 45 days from the date of the ruling in Canards III. See Order Re Stay of Consolidated Actions, ECF No. 52. Accordingly, the parties agree to extend Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading until 45 days after the issuance of the mandate in Canards III.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

1. The two above-captioned consolidated actions shall remain stayed until the Ninth Circuit issues its mandate in Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec v. Bonta (CanardsIII), Ninth Circuit case no. 20-55882/20-55944

2. Defendants' responsive pleading to Interlink's First Amended Complaint shall be due 45 days after issuance of the Ninth Circuit's mandate in Canards III.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Interlink Prods. Int'l v. Bohan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-cv-02277-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Interlink Prods. Int'l v. Bohan

Case Details

Full title:INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. DREW BOHAN, and…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-02277-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)