Interface, Inc. v. Tandus Centiva Inc.

Full title: INTERFACE, INC., Appellant v. TANDUS CENTIVA INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 2016

636 F. App'x 801 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-1475 2015-1668

02-08-2016

INTERFACE, INC., Appellant v. TANDUS CENTIVA INC., Appellee

CANDICE C. DECAIRE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC. BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represented by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, DANA E. STANO, Atlanta, GA.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00333, IPR2013-00527.

JUDGMENT

CANDICE C. DECAIRE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC. BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represented by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, DANA E. STANO, Atlanta, GA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court