From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Assoc. Ceilings

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 17, 1981
430 N.E.2d 1307 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Submitted October 14, 1981

Decided November 17, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALVIN F. KLEIN, J.

Bernard Caesar and Paul Kovner for appellant.

Carole R. Moskowitz and J. Robert Morris for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Our review of the scant record in this case fails to disclose prima facie proof that the defendant was in control of the damaged premises at the time the ceiling collapsed or that there was negligence in the performance of the work. Specifically, the only testimony on the latter score came from Ralph Bank, the plaintiff's subrogor's president, who, disclaiming any personal knowledge on the subject, could recite no more than a hearsay conversation with Irving Buller, the president of the defendant, in which the latter, who was deceased by the time of the trial, in turn was said to have told Bank that unnamed "people that were involved in the demolition", presumably ones other than the defendant, had not been aware of the fact that a wall they were removing supported the ceiling. Moreover, notably, there was no proof that these actions were negligent. In addition, without proof of control, an essential predicate for the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was absent. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Assoc. Ceilings

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 17, 1981
430 N.E.2d 1307 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Assoc. Ceilings

Case Details

Full title:INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, as Subrogees of SEAMAN FURNITURE CO.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 17, 1981

Citations

430 N.E.2d 1307 (N.Y. 1981)
430 N.E.2d 1307
446 N.Y.S.2d 254

Citing Cases

Pollock v. Rapid Indus

I find no merit to plaintiff's assertion that the case should have gone to the jury on the doctrine of res…

Butti v. Rollins

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and…